Esta página solo está disponible en inglés. Ir a la portada en español

×

Questa pagina è disponibile solo in inglese. Home page in italiano

×

Diese Seite ist nur auf Englisch verfügbar. Zur deutschen Startseite

×

Cette page est disponible uniquement en anglais. Aller à la page d'accueil en français

×

The Container Owners Association has published a “Guide to Container Tracking and Telematics Technology”

The Container Owners Association has published a “Guide to Container Tracking and Telematics Technology”

The Container Owners Association has published a “Guide to Container Tracking and Telematics Technology”, providing container operators, leasing companies and other relevant stakeholders with an overview of the technology issues that they might face, and the choices that are available to them.

Commencing with a glossary of many of the different industry terms and acronyms that are frequently used, the Guidelines goes on to provide a background of the way that the industry has developed over the past decade. The evolution from ‘wired’ to ‘wireless’ has provided great opportunities – but adds significant complexity, because of the wide range of communication technologies available, how they are used around the world in different countries and communication issues with containers on vessels.

The Guidelines next cover some of the issues for tracking dry freight containers, including such aspects as: data flow, required communication frequency, battery life (and installation cost), power consumption, sensor technology requirements and compatibility with vessel partners. Issues for reefer container communication are also tackled – including landside transit, on-board vessels, global use, telematics technology.

The choices available for landside and inland operation, terminals and on-board vessels are reviewed. On vessels, there are a number of different suitable technologies – these are listed in the document.

The final section covers API – Application Programming Interface. The Guidelines explain that this needs to be integrated and agreed across the industry to ensure data can be transmitted by any hardware provider and provide the same standardised information to data users.

Detailed evaluation work will be required by the vessel and container operator before finalising the specification of a workable wireless data solution for a reefer or dry van fleet.
Cost considerations will include all of the following:

the purchase and installation of hardware on containers and ships;
co-ordinating with terminals on their communication infrastructure;
data transmission on land under data roaming contracts.

Given the wide variety of communication technologies that will need to be considered, operators of reefers will need to carefully consider the capabilities of products being offered by different telematics suppliers to see which systems best meet their needs both today and over the coming years. They should also consider what options conference and partner shipping lines are utilizing and whether alternative systems are also compatible.

Finally, operators will also need to consider API issues between differing systems to ensure greater flexibility and lower costs of operation over the long term.

Get the daily refrigeration briefing

One email a day. Trusted by 3,000+ RACHP professionals.

Related news

Most read this month

All news →

Related insights

Article

Secop’s Solar Direct Drive (SDD) System Earns WHO PQS Approval – The Team Behind It

Partner's material In March 2026, Secop’s Solar Direct Drive Power Management Module was granted WHO PQS prequalification and officially listed in the WHO Catalogue of Prequalified Immunization Devices. The WHO IMD-PQS (Immunization Devices Performance, Quality and Safety programme) is the global benchmark for cold chain equipment used in immunisation. Being listed in its catalogue is

22 Jun 2026
Tech Guide

Case Study – Effect of Louvers or diffusers on air flow distribution and cooling time on a meat log during Chill cycle

By Kushal Aurangabadkar An experimental analysis was conducted on a cooler space measuring 3.66 m × 6.096 m (12.0 ft × 20.0 ft), equipped with an ammonia refrigeration coil, five 30 cm (12 in.) fans, and five diffusers. The study measured airflow patterns, cooling rates, and heat transfer efficiency in meat storage by testing two configurations:

Kushal Aurangabadkar · 21 Jan 2026
Tech Guide

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for Modular Refrigeration Systems in Life Sciences Distribution Centers

by Ramez Naguib, P.E. Introduction Life sciences distribution centers are under immense pressure to deliver consistent temperature control, comply with increasingly stringent regulations, and optimize operational efficiency. Traditional built-up refrigeration systems often prove cumbersome, costly, and slow to implement. In contrast, modular, factory-assembled refrigeration systems have emerged as a compelling alternative. Drawing on lessons from

14 Jan 2026